About Russell L. Parr

Professional Qualifications of Russell L. Parr, CFA, ASA

 

Mr. Parr is President of IPRA, Inc. He is an expert in determining the value of intellectual property. His books are published in Japanese, Korean, Italian, Chinese, Romanian and Russian.

Mr. Parr has completed complex consulting assignments involving the valuation and pricing of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intangible assets. His opinions are used to accomplish licensing transactions, acquisitions, transfer pricing, litigation support, collateral-based financing, and joint ventures.

Mr. Parr also has served asan expert witness regarding intellectual property infringement damages. Mr. Parr also publishes three royalty rate resource books, which have been sold all over the world. These books are dedicated to reporting detailed information about the economic aspects of intellectual property transactions including licensing and joint ventures.

Past assignments have included the valuation of the Dr. Seuss copyrights and the patent portfolio of AT&T. Mr. Parr has also conducted valuations and royalty rate studies for pharmaceuticals, semiconductor process and product technology, agricultural formulations, automotive battery technology, biotechnology, camera technology, chemical formulations, communications technology, computer software, cosmetics, consumer and corporate trademarks, drug delivery systems, flowers, incinerator feed systems, lasers, medical instrument technology, motivational book copyrights.



  •   Education   
     
      

    • Masters Business Administration, Rutgers University, 1981;
      • 

    • Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University, 1976;
      • 

    • Coursework toward Ph.D. in the International Business Management Program at Rutgers University.
      • 

    
 
  •   Professional Designations and Honors   
     
      

    • Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) awarded by the CFA Institute
      • 

    • Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA) awarded by the American Society of Appraisers
      • 

    • Rutgers Alumni Association Class of ’31 Award.
      • 

    • Rutgers Alumni Association Loyal Sons Award
      • 

    
 
  •   Professional Affiliations   
     
      

    • Advisory Board Member to Innovation Asset Group, Inc. an early-stage company developing intellectual property management software
      • 

    • Intangible Asset Valuation Standards Committee of the American Society of Appraisers – Member
      • 

    • Licensing Executives Society Member
      • 

    • Licensing Economics Review Editorial Board
      • 

    • The Licensing Journal Advisory Board
      • 

    • American Society of Appraisers Member
      • 

    • Chartered Financial Analysts Institute Member
      • 

    • Rutgers University Alumni Association, Past Board Director
      • 

    
 
  •   Publications – Books   
     
    Royalty Rates for Licensing Intellectual Property, author, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007Royalty Rates for Technology, Third Edition, Intellectual Property Research Associates, Yardley, Pennsylvania, 2003.
    

    The Royalty Rate Report for Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Sixth Edition,Intellectual Property Research Associates, Yardley, Pennsylvania, 2006.
    

    Royalty Rates for Trademarks & Copyrights, Third Edition, Intellectual Property Research Associates, editor, Yardley, 2004.
    

    Technology Licensing – Corporate Strategies for Maximizing Value, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1996. Translated into Chinese.
    

    Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation & Infringement Damages, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005.
    

    Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, Third Edition, annually supplemented, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2000.
    

    Investing In Intangible Assets: Finding and Profiting From Hidden Corporate Value,author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1991.
    

    Intellectual Property: Licensing and Joint Venture Profit Strategies, Third Edition, annually supplemented, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2004.
    

    Intellectual Property Infringement Damages: A Litigation Support Handbook, Second Edition, annually supplemented, author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1999.
    

    Royalty Rates for Licensing Intellectual Property, author, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007
    

    Royalty Rates for Technology, Third Edition, Intellectual Property Research Associates, Yardley, Pennsylvania, 2003.
    

    The Royalty Rate Report for Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Sixth Edition,Intellectual Property Research Associates, Yardley, Pennsylvania, 2006.
    

    Royalty Rates for Trademarks & Copyrights, Third Edition, Intellectual Property Research Associates, editor, Yardley, 2004.
    

    Technology Licensing – Corporate Strategies for Maximizing Value, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1996. Translated into Chinese.
    

    Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation & Infringement Damages, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005.
    

    Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, Third Edition, annually supplemented, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2000.
    

    Investing In Intangible Assets: Finding and Profiting From Hidden Corporate Value,author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1991.
    

    Intellectual Property: Licensing and Joint Venture Profit Strategies, Third Edition, annually supplemented, co-author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2004.
    

    Intellectual Property Infringement Damages: A Litigation Support Handbook, Second Edition, annually supplemented, author, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1999.
    
 
  •   Publications – Articles   
     
    Investment Theory For Royalty Rates, co-authored, les Nouvelles – The Journal of the Licensing Executive Society, December 1987, page 95.
    

    Royalties – Fair Rates of Return, Patent World, July 1988, page 36.
    

    IRS White Paper On Intercompany Pricing, co-authored, Trademark World, February 1989, page 28.
    

    Brand Name Buying, Registered Representative, February 1990, page 46.
    

    The Inefficient Market for Intellectual Property: An Update on the Global Scene, The Journal of Proprietary Rights, February 1990, page 17.
    

    Royalty Rate Economics, European Intellectual Property Review, April 1990, page 133.
    

    No Name. No Gain, Personal Investor, May 1990, page 27.
    

    An Economic Approach to Royalty Rate Determination Part I of III, co-authored, The Journal of Proprietary Rights, June 1990, page 19.
    

    An Economic Approach to Royalty Rate Determination Part II of III, co-authored, The Journal of Proprietary Rights, August 1990, page 17.
    

    How To Make Money By Investing In Innovative Leaders, Boardroom Reports, August 1, 1991, page 14.
    

    An Economic Approach to Royalty Rate Determination Part III of III, co-authored, The Journal of Proprietary Rights, September 1990, page 17.
    

    Determining Royalty Rates for Intellectual Property by Using a Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Pricing, Business & Tax Planning Quarterly, Fall 1990, page 23.
    

    The Power of Trademarks in Mature Industries, Licensing Product Times, Fall Issue 1991, pg. 1.
    

    The Future is Intangible: Licensing and Joint Venturing Will Create Higher Corporate Value, International Company and Commercial Law Review, page 313.
    

    The New Focus of Acquisitions Is Intangible, Licensing Economics Review, Dec. 1991, pg. 19
    

    Intangible Asset Investing: Basic Trend of ’90s, Successful Innovator, March-April 1992, Vol. 1 No. 3, page 6.
    

    Valuation Issues in Transfer Pricing, chapter co-author, Transfer Pricing Handbook, edited by Robert Feinschreiber, published by John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
    

    The Doubled-Barreled Benefits of Acquiring a Brand, Mergers & Acquisitions, March-April 1993, page 36.
    

    The Future Is Intangible, The TQM Magazine, March-April 1993, page 7.
    

    Emergence of Intellectual Property Exploitation Strategies, The Licensing Journal, May 1993, page 10.
    

    Quantitative Methods of Valuing Intellectual Property, chapter co-author,
    

    The New Role of Intellectual Property in Commercial Transactions, edited by Melvin Simensky and Lanning G. Bryer, published by John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
    

    Intellectual Property Takes Center Stage, Multimedia and Technology Licensing Law Report, July 1994, page 1.
    

    Royalty Rates in General and on Average, The Journal of Technology Transfer, September 1995, Vol. 20, No. 2, page 22.
    

    Damage Awards, The IP Litigator, November/December 1995, Volume 1, Number 1, page 23.
    

    IP Leverage, Chapter Thirteen of the book titled From Ideas to Assets, edited by Bruce Berman and published by John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
    
 
  •   Conferences and Presentations   
     
    IP Valuation Patent Damages, presented at Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA, October 25, 2007
    

    Royalty Rates In and Out of Litigation, presented at the Law Seminars International conference titled Complex Intellectual Property Licensing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 19, 2005.
    

    Valuation of Patents Using the Relief from Royalty Approach, presented at the National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts Twleve Annual Consultants’ Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 2, 2005.
    

    Recent Royalty Rate Trends in Technology Licensing, presented to the Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, San Diego, California, Illinois, September 24, 2003.
    

    Calculating Royalty Rates, presented to the Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, San Diego, California, Illinois, September 23, 2003.
    

    Royalty Rate Derivation Methods, presented to the Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, October 2002.
    

    Royalty Rates for Technology, presented to the Licensing Executives Society Chicago Chapter, Chicago, Illinois, February 26, 2002.
    

    Valuation and Royalty Rate Methods for Pharma and Biotech, presented at the Strategic Research Institute conference titled Pharma Biotech: Intellectual Property and Business Development, Crowne Plaza Hotel, San Francisco, California, April 23, 2001.
    

    Patent Valuation and Royalty Rate Development, presented at the 2000 Licensing Executives Society Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Sheraton Centre, September 11, 2000
    

    Intellectual Property Valuation Issues and Strategies, presented at the Singapore-WIPO Joint Training Course for Asian and Pacific Region on Intellectual Property and Technopreneurship Development, November 16, 1999, Hotel Rendezvous, Singapore, Jointly sponsored by World Intellectual Property Organization and the Government of Singapore.
    

    Intellectual Property Valuation presented at the 10th Annual Cyberspace Licensing in the Electronic Age conference, sponsored by Glasser LegalWorks, Marriott Marquis, New York City, November 8, 1999.
    

    Methods for the Valuation of Intellectual Property, presented at Seminario Internaional sobre Valorization de la Propiedad Intelectual, November 19 and 20, 1998, Sheraton Hotel, Lima Peru, sponsored by INDECOPI of Peru and the World Intellectual Property Organization, of the United Nations.
    

    Methods for the Valuation of Intellectual Property, presented at Seminario Internaional sobre Valorization de la Propiedad Intelectual, November 19 and 20, 1998, Sheraton Hotel, Lima Peru, sponsored by INDECOPI of Peru and the World Intellectual Property Organization, of the United Nations.
    

    Valuing Intellectual Property: What’s it Worth? presented at the American Conference Institute’s conference titled Intellectual Property in Business Transactions, The Park Lane Hotel, New York City, January 30, 1997.
    

    Economic Factors for Intellectual Property Portfolio Management presented at the Licensing Executives Society E4 Committee Winter Conference titled Portfolio Management Strategies, Crystal Gateway Marriott, Crystal City, Virginia, December 12, 1996.
    

    Basic Intellectual Property Valuation for Licensing Executives presented at the 1996 Licensing Executives Society Conference, El Conquistador Resort, Fajardo, Puerto Rico, September 30, 1996.
    

    Intellectual Property Valuation and Licensing, presented to the Office of Corporate Relations and Technology Transfer of Rutgers University, co-hosted with Michael J. Lennon of Kenyon & Kenyon, Piscataway, New Jersey, June 26, 1996.
    

    Establishing Royalty Rates for Business Transactions, presented at the conference titled The Basics of Licensing and Licensing Law, sponsored by The Licensing Journal, Kent Press, The University Club, New York, New York, March 27, 1996.
    

    Computation of Damages, presented at the conference titled The Basics of Intellectual Property Litigation, sponsored by The IP Litigator, Kent Press, The University Club, New York, New York, March 28, 1996.
    

    Intellectual Property Valuation, presented at the American Intellectual Property Law Association, 19th Mid-Winter Institute – The Law of Computer Related Technology IV, La Quinta Resort Hotel, Palm Springs, California, January 26, 1996.
    

    A Conflicted Global Economy, presented at the 1995 Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, Marriott’s Orlando World Conference Center, Orlando Florida, October 24, 1995.
    

    Technology Licensing Strategies, presented at the 1995 Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, Marriott’s Orlando World Conference Center, Orlando Florida, October 25, 1995.
    

    Panel Discussion on Valuing Preclinical Trial Biodiagnostic Technology, presented at the 1995 Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, Marriott’s Orlando World Conference Center, Orlando Florida, October 26, 1995.
    

    Valuation of Intellectual Property, presented at the First Annual Licensing Seminar of the New Jersey Intellectual Property Law Association, Woodbridge Hilton, Iselin, New Jersey, October 19, 1995.
    

    Intellectual Property Valuation, presented at the Advanced Licensing Institute of the Franklin Pierce Law Center, Concord, New Hampshire, July 26, 1995.
    

    New Trends in Intellectual Property, presented at the Intellectual Property Conference, Cooper Union, New York, New York, April 27, 1995
    

    Intellectual Property Infringement Damages, presented at the American Society of Appraisers, Philadelphia Chapter, Business Valuation Conference, Sheraton of Bucks County, Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, April 21, 1995.
    

    Technology, Royalty Rates & Investment Risk, presented at the 1994 Licensing Executives Society Annual Conference, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Waikoloa, Hawaii, October 19, 1994.
    

    Quantifying and Valuing Royalties for Intellectual Property presented at the annual conference of The Intellectual Property Institute for Corporate Counsel at Le Meridien Hotel, Chicago, Illinois, September 26, 1994.
    

    Royalty Rate Negotiations, presented to the New Jersey Entrepreneurial Network, Princeton, New Jersey, June 1, 1994.
    

    Valuing Intellectual Property presented at the American Society of Appraisers conference titled Current Topics in Business Valuation ’94 at The Warwick Hotel, New York City on May 17, 1994.
    

    Valuation of Intellectual Property Rights presented at the Fourth Annual American Law Institute-American Bar Association Course of Study titled Trademarks, Copyrights, and Unfair Competition for the General Practitioner, Stouffer Concourse Hotel, Washington, DC, April 15, 1994.
    

    Technology Royalty Rates presented at the Association of Federal Technology Transfer Executives at the Los Angeles Airport Marriott, January 26, 1994.
    

    The Wall Street Perspective – Brand Values presented at the conference titled Brands sponsored by Strategic Research Institute at The Grand Hyatt Hotel, New York, New York, November 10-11, 1993.
    

    Quantifying and Valuing Royalties for Intellectual Property presented at the annual conference of The Intellectual Property Institute for Corporate Counsel at the Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, September, 30, 1993.
    

    The New Role of Intellectual Property in Commercial Transactions presented as part of the Executive MBA Seminar Series at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City, March 26, 1993 and June 21, 1993.
    

    Royalty Rates in Licensing & Litigation presented to the New Jersey Intellectual Property Law Association at the Forrestal Center Marriott Hotel, Princeton, NJ on January 14, 1993. Technology Valuation presented at the conference titled
    

    Appraising Intellectual Property, sponsored by the American Society of Appraisers at Hyatt Regency at Reunion, Dallas, Texas, January 11, 1993.
    

    Valuation and Royalty Rate Determination presented at the conference titled Licensing Opportunities in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries sponsored by The Institute for International Research, Park Hyatt Hotel, Washington DC, December 2, 1992.
    

    Hidden Corporate Assets and Royalties, presented at the Third Annual Invention Convention, The Pasadena Convention Center, Pasadena Ca., September 5, 1992. Co-Chairman of the Conference titled
    

    Strategies for Intellectual Property Valuation, Exploitation and Underwritingsponsored by the Institute for International Research presented at the Park Lane Hotel, New York on May 18-19, 1992.
    

    Valuation of Technology presented at the conference titled Joint Ventures and Other Cooperative Business Arrangements sponsored by Prentice Hall Law & Business and presented at the Loews-Summit Hotel on October 30-31, 1990.
    

    Valuation of Technology presented at the conference titled Joint Ventures and Other Cooperative Business Arrangements sponsored by Prentice Hall Law & Business and presented at the Four Seasons Clift Hotel on November 9-10, 1991.
    

    Advanced Valuation of Intellectual Property presented at the International Conference of the American Society of Appraisers in Washington DC on June 15, 1987.
    
 
  •   Court Testimony, 1991 to Present   
     
    Court Testimony, 1991 to Present
    

    


    
Case:

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Fred W. McLafferty et al No. 13 143 Y 01321 05 American Arbitration Association

    

    
Issue:

Breach of Contract

    

    
Client:

John Wiley & Sons

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Finjan Software, Ltd. v. Secure Computing Corporation, Cyberguard Corporation, and Webwasher AG., Civil Action No. 06-369-GMS United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding proactive scanning network malware protection

    

    
Client:

Finjan

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Pedinol Pharmacal, Inc. v, Rising Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-2120 (Wexler, J., Tomlinson, M.) United States District Court Eastern District of New York

    

    
Issue:

False advertising regarding Lactinol skin therapy product

    

    
Client:

International Norcent

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

US Phillips Corporation v. International Norcent Technology, et al., No. 06-CV-01366 ER (PLAX), United States District Court Central District of California, Western Division

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding DVD players

    

    
Client:

International Norcent

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John O. Hayhurst, MD v. Arthrex, Inc., Civil Case No. CV04 0029 SI, United States District Court District of Oregon

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding shoulder anchors used in surgery

    

    
Client:

Arthrex, Inc.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Monsanto, Inc. v, Bayer Crop Science Civil Action No. 4:00CV01915 ERW, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding agricultural-genetic patented invention.

    

    
Client:

Bayer Crop Science

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc. et al, No. 00-CV-12234 EFH, United States District Court for the District Massachusetts

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding prepaid wireless phone services

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. ViaCell, Inc., et al Civil Action No. 02-148-GMS, United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding cord blood collection and storage

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Tulip Computers International B.V. v. Dell Computer Corp. Civil Action No. 00-981-Jordan United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding personal computer Form Factor.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Honeywell International v. Hamilton Sundstrand, Inc. Civil Action No. 99-309-GMS (Sleet), United States District Court for District of Delaware.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding auxiliary power unit engine technology.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

BioNumerik Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. M. Gopal Nair, American Arbitration Association, No. AAA 70 181 0030900, Austin, Texas.

    

    
Issue:

Damages to intellectual property and business value from failure to perform contracted obligations.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Plant Genetics Systems v. DeKalb ., Civil Action No. 3:96CV02015, United States District Court for Connecticut, East Hartford.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding glufosinate resistant (Liberty herbicide) corn seeds.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Plant Genetics Systems v. Novartis, Civil Action No. 96-459, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Judge Farnan.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding agricultural-genetic patented invention.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Pocklington Foods, Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as Represented by the Provincial Treasurer of Alberta, Court of Queens, Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Alberta.

    

    
Issue:

Appropriate methods for valuing expropriated trademarks.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

CFMT, Inc. and CFM Technologies, Inc. v. Steag Microtech, Inc. Civil Action No. 95-442 (McKelvie), United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding semiconductor manufacturing equipment patent.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., C.A. No. 94-16-LON, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding disposable infant diaper patents.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Ensco Inc. v. Komar Industries, No. LR-C-93-159, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, Little Rock, Arkansas.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding incinerator conveyor system.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Gardner v. Ford Motor Company, United States District Court, District of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding exhaust gas recovery system for automobiles and trucks.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

GNB Technologies, Inc. v. Exide Corporation, C.A. No. 88-407, United States District Court, District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, Roderick P. McKelvie presiding.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding automotive battery terminal configuration.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

In Re IA Holdings, Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, No. 86-14981, Media, Pennsylvania, Edward S. Lawhorne presiding.

    

    
Issue:

Valuation of public company shares for dissenting shareholder lawsuit.

    

    
Client:

Delaware County Court, Media, Pennsylvania

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Warner Lambert v. American Safety Razor, Civil Action No. 91-11, United States District Court, District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, Joseph J, Farnan, Jr. presiding.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding placement of polyox strip on razor blade cartridges.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Wojick v. Wojick, Family Law Matter, No. 92-FA-836797, Cheyenne, Wyoming.

    

    
Issue:

Valuation of closely held business, Cheyenne Outfitters, for divorce proceedings.

    

    
Client:

Husband and wife.

    
    

    
 
  •   Deposition Testimony, 1991 to Present   
     
    Deposition Testimony, 1991 to Present
    

    


    
Case:

ZymoGenetics, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc. Civil Action No. 06-CV-0500 United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding ORENCIA®

    

    
Client:

John Wiley & Sons

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Fred W. McLafferty et al No. 13 143 Y 01321 05 American Arbitration Association

    

    
Issue:

Breach of Contract

    

    
Client:

John Wiley & Sons

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

GTX Corporation v. Kofax Image Products, Inc., Nuance Communications, Inc., and Canon USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 6:06-CV-244 (LED) United States District Court

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding de-skewing scanner software

    

    
Client:

GTX Corproation

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Domain Assets, LLC v, Petters Group Worldwide, LLC File No. 06-4379 (PAM/JSM) United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

    

    
Issue:

Breach of Contract

    

    
Client:

Domain Assets, LLC

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Finjan Software, Ltd. v. Secure Computing Corporation, Cyberguard Corporation, and Webwasher AG., Civil Action No. 06-369-GMS United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding proactive scanning network malware protection

    

    
Client:

Finjan

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Pedinol Pharmacal, Inc. v, Rising Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-2120 (Wexler, J., Tomlinson, M.) United States District Court Eastern District of New York

    

    
Issue:

False advertising regarding Lactinol skin therapy product

    

    
Client:

Pedinol

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

US Phillips Corporation v. International Norcent Technology, et al., No. 06-CV-01366 ER (PLAX), United States District Court Central District of California, Western Division

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding DVD players

    

    
Client:

International Norcent

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Schindler Elevator Corporation, and Inventio AG, v Otis Elevator Company, Civil Action No. 06-CV-05377 (RCC), United States District Court District for the Southern District of New York

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding elevator systems

    

    
Client:

Schindler

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

NEBL, Inc. and Jeffrey Dann, MD v. American Medical Systems, Inc., Civil Case No. 04-CV-12482 RGS, United States District Court District of Massachusetts

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding urinary incontinence

    

    
Client:

NEBL, Inc.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John O. Hayhurst, MD v. Arthrex, Inc., Civil Case No. CV04 0029 SI, United States District Court District of Oregon

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding shoulder anchors used in surgery

    

    
Client:

Arthrex, Inc.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Procter & Gamble v. The United States, Civil Case No. 1:05cv355 United States District Court District for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division

    

    
Issue:

Value of technology given as a charitable donation

    

    
Client:

Procter & Gamble

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Paul Cozza v. Network Associates, Inc., Civil Action No. 02-11135 RGS, United States District Court District of Massachusetts

    

    
Issue:

Anti-virus software invention

    

    
Client:

Network Associates, Inc.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Lear Corporation v. Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC et al, Case, No. 03-054226-CK, State of Michigan, Circuit Court fo the County of Oakland

    

    
Issue:

Attorney Malpractice loss of patent rights for interior automtive dorr manufacturing process

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center et al v. Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Case, No. BC 297823, Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Los Angeles

    

    
Issue:

Attorney Malpractice – loss of patent rights for laser eye surgery invention

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Wesleyan Company v. US Army, ASBCA No. 53896, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

    

    
Issue:

Taking of technology regarding On-The-Move Soldier Hydration System

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc. et al, No. 00-CV-12234 EFH, United States District Court for the District Massachusetts

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding prepaid wireless phone services

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Edwards LifeSciences v. Sulzer Carbomedics, Inc. Civil Action No. 02-508-SLR United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding heart value ring repair products

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Novamedix Ltd. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. Civil Action No. SA-92-CA-0177 United States District Court for the Western District of Texas San Antonio Division

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding compression therapy foot pump for DVT prevention

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. ViaCell, Inc., et al Civil Action No. 02-148-GMS, United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding cord blood collection and storage

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Tulip Computers International B.V. v. Dell Computer Corp. Civil Action No. 00-981-Jordan United States District Court for the District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding personal computer Form Factor.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Monsanto, Inc. v, Aventis CropScience, NV Civil Action No. 4:00CV01915 ERW, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding agricultural-genetic patented invention.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Edwards LifeSciences Corp and Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Medtronic, Inc. Civil Action No. 00-621-SLR, United States District Court of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding patented technology used in artificial heart valves

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Dr. George S. Allen. v. Howmedica Leibinger, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 98-613 (JIF), United States District Court of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Misrepresentation of patent position regarding surgical imaging systems and markers.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Dr. George S. Allen. v. Howmedica Leibinger, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 98-613 (JIF), United States District Court of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Misrepresentation of patent position regarding surgical imaging systems and markers.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Revlon Consumer Products Corp. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. et al, Civ. No. 00-CIV-5930 (RMB), United States District Court Southern District of New York

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding patented technology used in makeup foundations.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hamilton Sunstrand Corporation, Civil Action No. 99-309 (GMS), United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages patented technology used in jet aircraft auxiliary power units.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Nova Biomedical Corporation v. iStat Corporation., Civil Action No. 95-11396-RGS, United States District Court District Court of Massachusetts.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding patented blood gas medical instrument.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Plant Genetics Systems v. DeKalb ., Civil Action No. 3:96CV02015, United States District Court for Connecticut, East Hartford.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding glufosinate resistant (Liberty herbicide) corn seeds.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Crystal Semiconductor Corporation v. Opti, Inc. and TriTech Microelectronics, Inc., Civil Action No. 97-CA-026-SS, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.

    

    
Issue:

Noise reduction technology used in PC audio analog to digital converters.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

American Online, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., Case No. 98-1821-A, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

    

    
Issue:

Trademark infringement.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Fort James Corporation v. Sweetheart Cup Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 97-C-1221, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement of paper plate manufacturing technology.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Plant Genetics Systems v. Novartis, Civil Action No. 96-459, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Judge Farnan.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding agricultural-genetic patented invention.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Evans Medical Ltd., Medeva Plc., and SmithKline Beecham v. American Cyanamid Company, 96 Civ. 3529 (WCC), United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding pertusis antigene (69k) patent.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Plant Genetics Systems v. Ciba Seeds and Mycogen Plant Science Inc., Civil Action No. 1:95CV00741, United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Durham Division.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding agricultural-genetic patented invention.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Gerald L. Terwilliger v. York International, United States District Court, District of Richmond Virginia.

    

    
Issue:

Employee compensation for patented invention

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Thiokol Corporation v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc. and Hercules Inc., Case No. 95-706 (JJF), United States District Court, District of Delaware

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding rocket motor insulation.

    

    
Client:

Defendant.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Mallinckrodt Sensor Systems, Inc., Case No. 94-12288-PBS, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding blood gas medical instrument.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Mobil Oil Corporation v. Exxon Corporation, Case No. 96-1603-A, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding plastic film resins.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Logan Farms v. Pravel et al., Harris County Court, Houston Texas

    

    
Issue:

Patent attorney malpractice

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

CFMT, Inc. and CFM Technologies, Inc. v. Steag Microtech, Inc. Civil Action No. 95-442 (McKelvy), United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding semiconductor manufacturing equipment patent.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Chemtron, Inc. v. Diversey US Holdings, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 95-1722-A, United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding detergent dispensing system for institutional warewash.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Gilbarco, Inc. v. Octel Communications Corp., Case No. C-94-20780-JW, United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding voice information processing patents.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff.

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., C.A. No. 94-16-LON,

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding disposable infant diaper patents.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Ensco Inc. v. Komar Industries, No. LR-C-93-159, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, Little Rock, Arkansas.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding incinerator conveyor system.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

GNB Technologies, Inc. v. Exide Corporation, C.A. No. 88-407, United States District Court, District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, Roderick P. McKelvy presiding.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding automotive battery terminal configuration.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Allied Materials and Equipment Company, Inc. v. Pappa Geppetto’s Toys Victoria, Ltd., Case No. 92-2030-0, United States District Court, District of Kansas.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding copyright toy – The Squish.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Support Systems International, Inc., Civil Action No. SA-91-CA-0927, United States District Court, Western District of Texas.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding hospital bed therapeutic systems

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Pfizer, Inc. v. Astra

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages associated with trademark suffix – XL.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Susan M. Maxwell v. K Mart Corp., Melville Corp., Morse Shoe Inc. and Shopko, Inc., Civil Action No. 4-93-525, United States District Court, District of Minnesota.

    

    
Issue:

Infringement damages regarding system to tie together pairs of shoes for rack display.

    

    
Client:

Defendant

    
    

    

    


    
Case:

Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. William Norvell

    

    
Issue:

Damages regarding failure to obtain foreign patents for well-drilling equipment.

    

    
Client:

Plaintiff

    
    

    
 

  



   

 
  
 
  

 

IPRA News
03/04/2018: Royalty Rates for Technology 7th Edition

Available Now in IPResearch Store

Click Here To Learn More.




NEW: Determination of Royalty Rates for Technology Licensing

Available Now


Click Here For More Information.


DETERMINATION OF ROYALTY RATES FOR TECHNOLOGY pic